Add string accessors, working towards first program
This commit is contained in:
28
main.cpp
28
main.cpp
@@ -32,23 +32,26 @@ For now I don't thing it should be overloadable.
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@todo
|
||||
[ ] - Operators: Bit negation, Not
|
||||
[ ] - Converting from U64 token to S64 Atom introduces unnanounced error (negates) - probably need big int
|
||||
[ ] - Compiling and running a program
|
||||
[ ] - Passing down program to compile through command line
|
||||
[ ] - More for loop variations
|
||||
[ ] - Fixing access to constants, in C we cant have constants inside of structs / functions so we need to rewrite the tree
|
||||
[ ] - Default values in structs??? Should compound stmts bring values from default values?? Maybe not? Whats the alternative
|
||||
[ ] - Write up on order independent declarations
|
||||
[ ] - Switch
|
||||
[ ] - More basic types
|
||||
|
||||
[ ] - Comma notation when declaring variables thing1, thing2: S32
|
||||
[ ] - Array of inferred size
|
||||
[ ] - Add single line lambda expressions
|
||||
[ ] - Ternary operator
|
||||
|
||||
[ ] - Field access rewrite
|
||||
[ ] - Constants embeded in structs should be able to refer to other constants in that namespace without prefix
|
||||
[ ] - Converting from U64 token to S64 Atom introduces unnanounced error (negates) - probably need
|
||||
[ ] - Order independent constants in structs
|
||||
[ ] - Can you even have recursive lambdas in structs, other recursive stuff
|
||||
[ ] - Fix recursive lambdas in structs
|
||||
[ ] - Fixing access to functions/structs, in C we cant have functons inside of structs / functions so we need to rewrite the tree
|
||||
|
||||
[ ] - Casting to basic types by call S64(x)
|
||||
[ ] - Default values in structs??? Should compound stmts bring values from default values?? Maybe not? Whats the alternative
|
||||
[ ] - Type aliases :: should probably be strictly typed, but assigning constant values should work
|
||||
|
||||
@ideas
|
||||
@@ -59,16 +62,19 @@ For now I don't thing it should be overloadable.
|
||||
@donzo
|
||||
[x] - Test new operators, add constant eval for them
|
||||
[x] - lvalue, rvalue concept so we cant assign value to some arbitrary weird expression
|
||||
[x] - More basic types
|
||||
[x] - Add basic support for floats
|
||||
[x] - Add basic setup for new type system
|
||||
[x] - Access through struct names to constants Arena.CONSTANT
|
||||
[x] - Enums
|
||||
[x] - Initial for loop
|
||||
[x] - Enum . access to values
|
||||
[x] - Infinite for loop
|
||||
[x] - in new typesystem: Fix calls, fix all example programs
|
||||
[x] - Fix arithmetic operations in new type system
|
||||
[x] - Init statements, different kinds [+=] [-=] etc.
|
||||
[x] - Struct calls
|
||||
[x] - Operators: Bit negation, Not
|
||||
[x] - Default values in calls
|
||||
[x] - Resolving calls with default values
|
||||
[x] - Pass statement
|
||||
@@ -119,11 +125,11 @@ int main(){
|
||||
result = compile_file("new_types.kl"_s);
|
||||
printf("%s", result.str);
|
||||
|
||||
// result = compile_file("lexer.kl"_s);
|
||||
// FILE *f = fopen("program.c", "w");
|
||||
// assert(f);
|
||||
// fprintf(f, "%.*s", (int)result.len, result.str);
|
||||
// fclose(f);
|
||||
result = compile_file("program.kl"_s);
|
||||
FILE *f = fopen("program.c", "w");
|
||||
assert(f);
|
||||
fprintf(f, "%.*s", (int)result.len, result.str);
|
||||
fclose(f);
|
||||
|
||||
__debugbreak();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user